Announcement PDF Dart Mining NL ABN: 84 119 904 880 Level 6, 412 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Contact: James Chirnside Email: jchirnside@dartmining.com.au Mobile: +61 447 447 613 Webpage: www.dartmining.com.au LinkedIn: Dart Mining NL Twitter: @DartMining 1 | P a g e ASX Release 11th November 2025 SUBSTANTIAL AND ROBUST EXPLORATION TARGET DEFINED FOR TRIUMPH GOLD PROJECT Dart Mining NL (“Dart” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the maiden Exploration Target for its flagship Triumph Gold Project located 80km south of Gladstone, Central Queensland. The Triumph Exploration Target is based on existing drilling where drill hole spacing is currently too sparse for declaration of a JORC Mineral Resource. The Exploration Target therefore represents a strong growth strategy for the Triumph Project through increased drilling density amongst proven drill hole intercepts. The Company remains excited about gold prospectivity outside the Exploration Target. HIGHLIGHTS The Triumph Exploration Target includes: • Declaration of the Triumph Exploration Target of 5.1 - 7.6 Mt @ 1.72 - 2.52 g/t Au for 285,100- 613,200oz gold, with a base case of 6.9Mt @ 2.29 g/t Au for 506,800oz gold; • The Exploration Target declaration is an addition to the previously declared JORC Mineral Resource of 2.16Mt @ 2.17g/t Au for 150,000oz gold at a 1g/t Au cut-off (ASX: DTM 4 Mar 2025); • 90% of the Exploration Target lodes are defined within 500m of the existing Triumph Mineral Resource; • Triumph Exploration Target represents an ideal mixture of new deposits as well as near prospect extensions, taking into account the existing drill hole database and Dart’s 2025 drilling results at New Constitution, South Constitution, and Big Hans; • The Exploration Target is high quality as it is defined by drilling. Each of the 41 new lodes identified has a minimum of 1 drill hole intercept and an average of 5. The spacing of this drill hole data has previously been considered too sparse for Mineral Resource declaration and hence presents an excellent growth pathway as an Exploration Target. The potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Targets are conceptual in nature and, as such, there has been insufficient exploration drilling conducted to estimate a Mineral Resource. At this stage it is uncertain if further exploration drilling will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource. The Exploration Target has been prepared in accordance with the JORC Code (2012). 2 | P a g e Dart’s Chairman, James Chirnside, commented: “The development of the Exploration Target at Triumph is a true representation of the value that Dart sees in the asset. The expansive amount of drilling that was previously completed, whilst insufficient to include in a Mineral Resource, has paved the way for the delineation of what is an impressive and robust Exploration Target. Dart will use this to guide exploration strategy and to continue to improve and add to the Mineral Resource base at Triumph. Importantly, the Exploration Target only really focuses on open pit depths up to 200m. This is a reflection of the depth of drilling historically, but as we have seen in the few deep holes drilled by Dart, the potential for high grade underground targets is also present and included here but on a more conservative basis. While the ounces defined in the Exploration Target are impressive, the grade of the open pit targets is equally as important. The Exploration Target presents a grade 2.29g/t Au compared to the current Mineral Resource of 2.17 g/t Au. In the context of a strong and evolving gold market, Triumph can be viewed as a key prospective Development Gold Project for Central Queensland.” The Triumph Exploration Target builds on the March 2025 Inferred Mineral Resource of 2.16 Mt @ 2.17g/t Au for 150,000oz gold which had already highlighted impressive growth since the maiden Mineral Resource Estimate (ASX: DTM 4 Mar 2025). The Exploration Target, which is outlined in detail in Table 1, shows a mix of Near Prospect extensions to existing resources at New Constitution, South Constitution, Big Hans, Super Hans and Bald Hill as well as new Regional Targets. The Near Prospect extensions are areas that were not classified in the previous Mineral Resource or new lodes that Dart has drilled and intersected in its 2025 drilling programme. An isometric view of the Exploration Target relative to the existing Mineral Resource is shown in Figure 1. Approximately 80% of the Exploration Target ounces are classed as open pit targets (<200m deep) with the remaining 20% as underground, this reflects the depth of existing drilling rather than prospectivity. High-grade underground mining lodes remain a key target for resource expansion which has been recently highlighted by Dart’s deep drilling along with additional shallow targets. Table 1: Summary of Triumph Exploration Target Tonnes and Gold Grade ranges1 . Depth Target Type Tonnes (Mt) – Low Tonnes (Mt) – Base Tones (Mt) – High Grade – Low (ppm) Grade – Base (ppm) Grade – High (ppm) Troy Ounces – Low (koz) Troy Ounces – Base (koz) Troy Ounces – High (koz) < 200m Regional Targets 2.74 3.65 4.01 1.35 1.81 1.99 119.2 211.9 256.4 Near Prospect 2.01 2.68 2.95 1.68 2.24 2.46 108.6 193.0 233.6 > 200m Regional Targets 0.25 0.33 0.36 5.59 7.45 8.20 44.0 78.2 94.7 Near Prospect 0.17 0.23 0.25 2.44 3.25 3.58 13.3 23.6 28.5 Total – Regional 2.98 3.97 4.37 1.70 2.27 2.50 163.2 290.2 351.1 Total – Near Prospect 2.18 2.91 3.20 1.74 2.32 2.55 121.8 216.6 262.1 Total – Global 5.16 6.88 7.57 1.72 2.29 2.52 285.1 506.8 613.2 1 Differences in totals may occur due to rounding. 3 | P a g e Figure 1: Isometric View of the Triumph Exploration Target relative to Existing Inferred Mineral Resource Regional Targets within the Exploration Target include: • Advance gold mine with best drill intercepts of 3m @ 24.97g/t gold, 1m @ 45g/t gold and 3m @ 9.7g/t gold (ASX: DTM 2 Dec 2024). Advance was the deepest historical mine at 121m depth and produced 2,605oz gold @ 77g/t between 1879 and 1881 from a 1.2-2.7m wide quartz-calcite-altered granite formation (Lionel Ball, 1906, Report on the Norton Goldfield, Queensland Geological Survey Publication No.208). At the bottom of the Advance mine, 121m depth, Ball (1906) reported a 1.5m wide calcareous formation grading 12.4g/t gold (8 dwt). • Historic mines with low density drilling including Spotted Gum and Marodian with a best drill intercept of 2m @ 8.92g/t gold (ASX: SHN 15 Jun 2023). The Marodian mine shaft is 98m deep (Ball, 1906). • Galena-Brigham Young, large strike length of workings with previous drill intercepts of 6m @ 3.9g/t gold, 1m @ 20.4g/t gold, and 2m @ 8.9g/t gold (ASX: DTM 2 Dec 2024) and a large IP chargeability anomaly at depth (ASX: MBK 31 Jan 2017). Recent discoveries and bulk tonnage targets including at Handbrake Hill and Chief Adachi where large IP resistivity lows occur, limited drilling includes intercepts of 3m @ 10.5g/t gold and 1m @ 6.1g/t within 10m @ 1.2g/t gold (ASX: MBK 31 Jan 2017). The Exploration Target is derived completely from the existing drill hole database and the known mineralisation strike, depth, and orientation of surrounding deposits used to help guide the interpretation. This makes the Exploration Target basis robust and sets out the impressive growth strategy for Triumph. When considering the base case of the Exploration Target, in conjunction with the existing Inferred Mineral Resource, Triumph has the potential to represent a deposit scale of more than 659,000oz gold. A map highlighting the Near Prospect and Regional Exploration Target lodes relative to the existing Inferred Mineral Resource is shown in Figure 1. The mineralised domains that form the Exploration Target have been defined from existing drillhole intersects which are located outside of the current 4 March 2025 Mineral Resource Estimation. The Open Pit targets are identified as being <200m depth with a cutoff grade of 0.5 ppm Au. Underground targets are >200m depth with a 2.5 ppm Au cutoff grade. Both the Near Prospect 4 | P a g e extensions and the Regional targets use the same density from the existing Mineral Resource of 2.86 for ore material. The consistency of density between deposits, and the proximity of the Exploration Target to the existing Mineral Resource is deemed suitable to share the same density assumptions. Exploration Targets were generated in geological modelling software (Leapfrog) by flagging significant gold intersections outside of the resource estimate wireframes, or where the drill density would not enable a resource estimate to occur. These intersections were then correlated with other surrounding intersections to form a lode wireframe. A 2 pass nearest neighbour estimation was used to populate a block model to report tonnes and grade for the Exploration Target. The new lodes between Regional and Near Prospect interpretation is built from 216 drill hole intercepts of gold not included in the Mineral Resource. The breakdown of Exploration Target ounces between the known prospects and regional are outlined in Table 2 and Table 3 for open pit and underground targets, respectively. Eighty percent of the Exploration Target ounces are within the open pit range of less than 200m. This is a direct reflection of the density of drilling across the project with majority of drill holes targeting shallow mineralisation. With Dart’s deep drilling currently underway, Dart aims to understand the underground potential for Triumph and if suitable, update the Exploration Target with additional underground targets where possible. Having an extensive Exploration Target defined will allow Dart to understand how best to move forward with drilling for the best conversion of drilling to Mineral Resource possible (on a “drilled metres/ gold ounces” basis for example). High- and low-level tonnes and grade ranges, in line with standard reporting of Exploration Targets, are a factor from the base model as there is sufficient data to build a 3D model. The low-level confidence factor of 0.75 (75%) and a high-level confidence factor of 1.1 (110%) was applied to the base model. This confidence factor aims to provide a reasonable gauge for the likely outcome from testing of the exploration targets. Capping was applied to several of the new lodes where excessively high grades were skewing the overall estimation at the discretion of the Competent Person. National Park and existing ML boundaries were used to limit the Exploration Target. All Exploration Target tonnes exist on EPM 18486 and EPM 19343 only and none within the National Park. Table 2: Summary of Exploration Targets grouped by Prospect – above 200m depth of cover. Target Area Tonnes (Mt) – Low Tonnes (Mt) - Base Tonnes (Mt) – High Grade – Low (ppm) Grade – Base (ppm) Grade – High (ppm) Troy Ounces – Low (koz) Troy Ounces – Base (koz) Troy Ounces – High (koz) Regional Targets 2.74 3.65 4.01 1.35 1.81 1.99 119.2 211.9 256.4 New Constitution 1.24 1.65 1.82 1.37 1.83 2.01 54.5 96.9 117.2 South Constitution 0.08 0.11 0.12 1.00 1.34 1.47 2.6 4.7 5.7 Big Hans 0.40 0.53 0.59 2.94 3.93 4.32 37.8 67.2 81.3 Bald Hill 0.20 0.27 0.29 1.83 2.44 2.68 11.7 20.7 25.3 Super Hans 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.65 0.87 0.96 1.9 3.3 4.1 Total – Open Pit Targets 4.75 6.33 6.96 1.49 1.99 2.19 227.8 404.9 490.0 5 | P a g e Table 3: Summary of Exploration Targets grouped by Prospect – below 200m depth of cover Target Area Tonnes (Mt) – Low Tonnes (Mt) - Base Tonnes (Mt) – High Grade – Low (ppm) Grade – Base (ppm) Grade – High (ppm) Troy Ounces – Low (koz) Troy Ounces – Base (koz) Troy Ounces – High (koz) Regional Targets 0.25 0.33 0.36 5.59 7.45 8.20 44.0 78.3 94.7 New Constitution 0.16 0.21 0.23 2.33 3.11 3.42 11.8 21.0 25.4 South Constitution - - - - - - - - - Big Hans 0.00 0.01 0.01 4.19 5.59 6.14 0.1 1.0 1.2 Bald Hill 0.01 0.01 0.01 3.69 4.92 5.41 0.9 1.6 1.9 Super Hans - - - - - - - - - Total – Underground Targets 0.41 0.55 0.61 4.30 5.74 6.31 57.3 101.8 123.2 An important consideration for the Exploration Target is how it will compliment the existing Mineral Resource. The defined lodes are predominately within 500m of the existing Mineral Resource and 99% of the lodes within 1,000m of the existing Mineral Resource. The observed geological logging highlights that the Exploration Target is the same mineralisation and alteration style as the existing Mineral Resource when considering the Northern and Southern Corridor. In addition the grade distribution comparitavely between the Mineral Resource and the Exploration Target are very similar statistically. Figure 2 highlights that the grade distribtion of the Exploration Target is very similar to the Mineral Resource. Figure 2: Histogram comparison between existing Mineral Resource and Exploration Target drill hole intercepts. 6 | P a g e PROPOSED EXPLORATION To delineate and confirm the Triumph Exploration Target, Dart proposes a 30,000m drill hole programme across these zones. This programme is in the stages of planning and Dart will look to start to execute this programme in due course. The prioritisation of different lodes will be guided by the initial drilling and expectations of anticipated $cost/ounce and total ounces to be converted to Mineral Resource where possible. The current proposed programme is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Plan view showing the proposed exploration sites to test the Exploration Target. 7 | P a g e NEXT STEPS At the Triumph Gold Project, Dart intends to: • Drill test depth potential beneath the Southern Mineralised Corridor and chargeability anomaly to the Northwest of New Constitution; • Continue Diamond drilling to expand the existing resources along strike and at depth with priorities defined on a cost/ounce and total ounces converted basis, possible mining scenarios will also be considered; • Undertake regional exploration, targeting the project area, as well as testing bulk tonnage targets including those at depth; and • Continue to review geochemical and geophysical databases to identify additional prospective target zones for exploration in addition to existing resource and exploration target areas Approved for release by the board of Directors. For more information contact: Please see our Investor Hub for further information James Chirnside Managing Director Dart Mining NL jchirnside@dartmining.com.au +61 419 605 842 Owen Greenberger Head of Exploration / Investor Relations Dart Mining NL ogreenberger@dartmining.com.au 8 | P a g e About Dart Mining The Triumph Gold Project is Dart’s first step into an advanced intrusion related gold system project in Queensland. Dart will look to develop a regional presence in Queensland through advanced stage intrusion related and epithermal gold projects. Dart is farming into the Coonambula Antimony-Gold Project in Central Queensland. Dart Mining will refocus our Victorian exploration to Central Victoria around our highly prospective Rushworth Goldfield tenements. Competent Person’s Statement The information in this report has been prepared, compiled, and verified by Mr. Owen Greenberger (B.Sc. Geology), a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr. Greenberger is Head of Exploration for Dart Mining. Mr. Greenberger has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposits under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a competent person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr. Greenberger takes responsibility for the exploration results, and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled and reviewed by Mr Andrew Dawes, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Andrew Dawes is employed by AHD Resources and consults to Dart Mining NL as well as being an option/rights holder of the Dart Mining NL. Mr Andrew Dawes has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources. Mr Andrew Dawes consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Dart Mining confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in this, or referenced relevant market announcements and, in the case of estimates of mineral resources or ore reserves, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates continue to apply and have not materially changed Forward-Looking Statement Certain statements contained in this document constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, Dart Mining’s current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry in which Dart Mining operates, and beliefs and assumptions regarding Dart Mining’s future performance. Such forward-looking statements are based on a number of estimates and assumptions made by the Company and its consultants in light of experience, current conditions and expectations of future developments which the Company believes are appropriate in the current circumstances. When used in this document, words such as; “anticipate”, “could”, “intends”, “estimate”, “potential”, “plan”, “seeks”, “may”, “should”, and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although Dart Mining believes that its expectations presented in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, achievements and performance of the Company to be materially different from the future results and achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking information is no guarantee of future performance and accordingly, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. 9 | P a g e APPENDIX ONE THE TRIUMPH GOLD PROJECT The Triumph Gold Project (Triumph or Project) is located approximately 520km by road north of Brisbane, Queensland, and is well serviced by the coastal port city of Gladstone 80km by road to the north. The Project is comprised of two Exploration Permits: EPM 18486 and EPM 19343 covering an area of 137.6 sq.km or 43 sub-blocks in total. The Company has recently applied for additional area immediately adjacent east of the triumph project with EMP 29097. Figure 6: Location of the Triumph Gold Project Local Geology The Triumph Gold Project is located in the Yarrol belt of the Wandilla Province (New England Orogen), where late Permian to Middle Triassic leucocratic intrusives are scattered throughout Devonian and Carboniferous sediments. Known mineralisation at Triumph is located within one of these intrusive bodies, the Norton Tonalite. The Norton Tonalite is dissected by numerous brittle faults and shears, as well as common minor mafic intrusive dykes of dolerite to basaltic composition. There is a distinct magnetic low signature at the core of the Norton Tonalite which is yet to be drill tested (ASX SHN: (ASX SHN: Robust Maiden Resource at Triumph Gold Project (31 March 2022)). 10 | P a g e Structure The Norton Tonalite is sinistrally offset by 1.8km by the northwest-trending Norton Fault, which can be traced for over 28km. Initially thought to post date mineralisation, a single drill hole has intersected the interpreted Norton Fault which returned 1m @ 2.9g/t Au and 1m @ 2.2g/t Au (ASX MKB: Triumph Gold Project Update Amended (25 July 2014) indicating that the fault may have been active during the main gold mineralisation event. On a local scale the Norton Tonalite has two distinct fracture orientations that both host gold mineralisation. One fracture set is approximately east-west striking and the other is northwest- southeast striking. These fracture orientations are likely to have formed contemporaneously (ASX SHN: Robust Maiden Resource at Triumph Gold Project (31 March 2022)). Mineralisation Gold and silver mineralisation is hosted in quartz-sulphide veins with pyrite and arsenopyrite forming the bulk of the sulphide. Calcite is abundant in some lodes and present in most or all of them. Veins typically show sericite-chlorite alteration halos although this appears to be more associated with quartz veining rather than sulphides. Mineralisation at Triumph is interpreted as an intrusion related gold system (IRGS) (ASX SHN: Robust Maiden Resource at Triumph Gold Project (31 March 2022)). Morrison (Intrusion-Related Gold Deposits in North Queensland, GSQ Project final meeting 7th December, 2017) stated that there were over 130 known IRGS in Queensland with 17 of these having resources over 1 million ounces. Sunshine have stated that Triumph is analogous to the Ravenswood IRGS gold deposit which has an endowment in excess of 5 million ounces of gold (ASX SHN: Follow Up Drilling at Liontown (19 June 2024)). Resource Highlights The Project is located across the historic Norton Goldfield and has a current JORC (2012) Mineral Resource Estimate prepared over five prospects in close proximity: Inferred gold resource of 150,091 oz made up of 2,16 million tonnes at a grade of 2.17g/t gold using a 1g/t cut-off has been declared in 2025 (ASX: DTM Mar 2025). More than 75% of the Triumph Inferred resource is within 100m of the surface and largely located within 1.2km of strike within a 6km long structural corridor (ASX SHN: Follow Up Drilling at Liontown (19 June 2024)). Dart considers that there is potential for proving up mineralisation below current drilling and open pit depths that may result in underground mining options subject to favourable economic studies. 11 | P a g e APPENDIX TWO JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. • Sampling is a mixture of Diamond core (half and full), along with RC chip sampling. • Sampling for diamond core is at the geologist’s discretion, with intervals typically ranging from 30cm to 1m. • Sampling intervals for RC drilling are at a nominal 1m interval. • Minimal RC composite samples are included. Composites are from 2 to 4m. • Historic Sample prep information is unknown for inherited samples. • Recent Samples are prepared with PREP-31B which includes crush to 70 % passing 2mm, riffle split off 1kg, pulverise split to better than 85% passing 75 microns. Drilling techniques • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). • Drilling is a mixture of Reverse Circulation (RC) and Diamond Drilling (DD). • Recent 2025 Diamond Drilling is of NQ core size and is triple tube drilling. Core is oriented where possible using the Reflex ACT III tool. Hole Type # % RC 119 79.3 DD 31 20.7 Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Sample recovery is unknown for historic drilling. • Recent drilling – Core is measured after each run and core recovery based on the drill metres is recorded. 12 | P a g e Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. • Once in the transition and fresh material, Triumph experiences limited to no core loss with the exception of intensely broken zones where recovery is still > 95%. • No relationship has been observed between sample recovery and gold grade. Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • All RC samples have been geologically logged. • The drill core has been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level to support appropriate mineral resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Core is logged both qualitatively and quantitatively. Core tray photography is both wet and dry photography. Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. • Historic Diamond sample method has been recorded as half core. • Historic RC sample method is unknown. • Recent Diamond core is whole core sampling so no sub-sampling techniques in the field are used which ensures appropriate in-situ representation. • Laboratory sample prep for historic samples is not recorded. • Recent drilling has undergone PREP-31B method includes crush to 70 % passing 2mm, riffle split off 1kg, pulverise split to better than 85% passing 75 microns. The larger 1kg riffle split is larger than the standard 250g to reduce sample size bias. • Sampling size is suitable to represent the mineralisation intersected. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. • QAQC status of historic samples is unknown. • All recent samples have been analysed at ALS Global (ALS, Brisbane). The below refers to recent QAQC techniques: • All samples were assayed for Au using a 50g fire assay with AU-ICP22 determination as well as ME-MS61 for multi element. In the case where key elements are over range, Ag, Pb, Zn, and Cu was completed using OG-62. As completed with OG46, and Au completed with GRA22. • The three types of QAQC samples were used were Certified Reference Material (CRM/Standards), Field Duplicates, and Blank material. • The Blanks consist of store-bought sand which has been shown to be barren based on previous work. The Blanks are used to provide 13 | P a g e Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary information of any possible contamination or calibration issues during the crush, pulverisation, and analytical phases. The field duplicates utilised the spear to collect a second sample to test repeatability (precision) of the original sample. The standards samples are used to test the accuracy of the analyses. • The CRMs were OREAS standards and include: OREAS 277, OREAS 245, and OREAS 233. • QAQC samples were entered into the sample stream at a rate of 1 in 20. • Where lower detection limits were reported for assay results these were replaced by half the lower detection limit for geological interpretation and modelling purposes. Verification of sampling and assaying • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. • No verification of historic drilling is known. The below refers to current verification methods: • All core photos are reviewed by the Competent Person and also visited site during early drilling. • No twinned holes have been