Announcement PDF ASX Release 3 July 2025 TRIUMPH DRILLING REVEALS NEW GOLD MINERALISED ZONES Dart Mining NL (“Dart” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce an update on its ongoing Triumph drilling programme. Dart has been drilling within the Inferred Mineral Resource area with the company’s diamond drill rig to acquire important structural orientation and confirmation assay data. The drilling has aimed to provide further support for resource classification upgrade from the existing 150koz Inferred Resource (ASX: DTM March 2025) to include a component of Indicated classification ounces to support further economic assessments and extraction scenarios. This update includes assay results and mineralisation observations from the first 10 drill holes. HIGHLIGHTS • • • • Dart has completed 1,906m (12 holes) of diamond core drilling across New Constitution, South Constitution, and Big Hans; Assays have been received for the first 10 drill holes (New Constitution and South Constitution only) with results for the last two completed drill holes outstanding with the laboratory; Highlight significant assays include: • TRDD001A: 10.5m @ 2.63 g/t Au + 12.21g/t Ag + 1.94% Zn from 68.6m; ▪ Including 3.1m @ 7.42 g/t Au + 25.42 g/t Ag + 6.37% Zn from 75.5m; • TRDD003: 1.9m @ 4.36 g/t Au + 6.13 g/t Ag from 146.5m ▪ Including 0.4m @ 18.5 g/t Au + 25.6 g/t Ag; • TRDD003: 1.95m @ 3.73 g/t Au + 0.9% Zn from 82.7m; ▪ Including 0.3m @ 22.8 g/t Au and 52.5 g/t Ag; • TRDD002A: 1.9m @ 3.42 g/t Au + 26.21 g/t Ag from 68.8m ▪ Including 0.3m @ 18.6 g/t Au + 152 g/t Ag; and • TRDD009: 6.0m @ 1.57 g/t Au from 116.0m; ▪ Including 0.4m @ 4.74 g/t Au from 116.0m and 0.4m @ 17.7 g/t Au + 44.9g/t Ag from 119.5m. In 8 of the 10 assayed drill holes, a total of 9 new mineralised zones have been interpreted which has indicated that New Constitution and South Constitution are made up of wider zones of discrete, stacked mineralised lodes; Dart is now focusing on drill testing structural and step out concepts at depths up to 450m to test and understand the bigger picture potential at Triumph. Dart Mining NL ABN: 84 119 904 880 Level 6, 412 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Contact: James Chirnside Email: jchirnside@dartmining.com.au Mobile: +61 447 447 613 Webpage: www.dartmining.com.au LinkedIn: Dart Mining NL Twitter: @DartMining 1|Page Darts Chairman, James Chirnside, commented: “The results received to date are an exciting development for Dart. While we are currently intersecting known mineralised structures with some surprising higher-grade results, the real impact is the new lodes that have been intercepted. These lodes are both on the hanging wall and footwall sides of the New Constitution and South Constitution systems and drilling confirms a strike length akin to the existing resource. Importantly, drilling is not only confirming known resources, but also pointing to resource upgrades, due to new parallel lodes being discovered. To that end we have commenced development of a high-quality Exploration Target statement for Triumph. This will be completed in the next couple of months and should adequately demonstrate the scale and significance of this exciting Intrusion Related Gold System. Given the highgrade gold ore at or near surface in several deposits, we are considering and studying various options around open pit project development.” A summary of the first 10 drill hole significant assay results is shown in Table 1 and the Dart drilling to date shown in Figure 1. Drilling to date on Triumph has shown that additional stacked lodes have been intersected adjacent to the existing MRE. Of the 10 drill holes completed with assays, at least 9 new lodes have been intersected adjacent to the known mineralisation. Each of these has above 1g/t cut-off Au intercepts, as well as anomalous silver (Ag) and arsenic (As) – note As is a strong path finder for Au at Triumph. Cross-section interpretation of the new lodes from three holes is shown in Figure 2. A complete set of cross section for the drill holes is included in Appendix 4. A long section highlighting the drilling results relative to the New Constitution orebody is shown in Figure 3. Significant intercepts that are interpreted to be new lodes are highlighted in Table 1. These new lodes present additional targets for Dart to consider in future exploration to expand the Mineral Resource Estimate around the existing known mineralisation. These adjacent parallel new lodes present further open cut targets and any increase in the number of stacked lodes could have an improved economic impact on strip ratio in a mining study scenario. Further, Dart’s observation of base metal association with structurally complex zones (and its association with high Au) is improving the exploration model going forward which will continue to unlock Triumph’s full potential. 2|Page Figure 1: Plan map showing location of reported drill hole assays compared to the existing Mineral Resource Estimate. 3|Page Table 1: Summary of significant intercepts of drilling results (seven holes) plus notable new lode intercepts. Drill Hole Name TRDD001A including TRDD001A including including TRDD001A including TRDD002A including including TRDD002A including TRDD003 TRDD003 including TRDD004 TRDD004 TRDD004 including TRDD005 TRDD005 TRDD006 including TRDD006 TRDD006 including TRDD007 TRDD007 TRDD007 including TRDD007 including TRDD008 TRDD009 including including TRDD009 including including TRDD009 TRDD010A TRDD010A including TRDD010A including TRDD010A including TRDD010A including From Depth (m) 37.5 38.0 68.6 69.1 76.6 136.7 137.2 68.8 68.8 69.65 119.6 119.9 82.7 146.5 147.0 11.0 19.8 65.15 66.8 35.8 54.6 113.8 114.3 126.5 131 134.5 128.7 142.4 49.5 50.0 100.5 100.5 23.8 69.1 69.1 71.6 116 116 119.5 165.2 40.0 53.0 53.0 107.4 108.4 114.0 114.0 123.3 126.5 Thickness (m) 1.5 0.5 10.5 2.3 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.9 1.4 0.3 1.6 0.8 2.0 6.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 2.1 0.4 2.6 1.3 1.3 0.35 1.7 5.0 1.5 0.3 0.3 1.3 0.3 2.65 0.4 0.3 2.8 0.5 0.3 6.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 1.5 0.5 1.3 0.3 1 0.5 4.0 0.75 Au g/t 2.26 6.76 2.63 1.92 11.27 2.31 6.92 3.42 4.64 18.65 0.95 1.88 3.73 1.40 9.19 1.58 2.44 2.00 9.43 0.52 1.29 3.52 13.05 0.58 0.38 1.01 1.42 1.65 1.59 6.82 0.88 4.21 3.68 0.41 0.39 2.07 1.57 4.74 17.7 1.87 1.74 0.94 2.7 0.47 1.06 0.99 1.61 0.42 0.91 Ag g/t Zn % 12.21 1.94 11.88 Notes NEW LODE NEW LODE 26.21 9.53 NEW LODE NEW LODE 0.9 NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE 20.86 NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE 11.8 48.8 44.9 LODE EXTENTION LODE EXTENTION LODE EXTENTION NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE NEW LODE 4|Page Figure 2: Cross section highlighting assay results > 0.1 g/t Au and new lode interpretations compared to the existing Mineral Resource Estimate. 5|Page Figure 3: Long Section through New Constitution showing the reported Dart drilling results relative to the known mineralisation and existing drill hole database. 6|Page Gold mineralisation is hosted within quartz-sulphide veins and is associated with pyrite and arsenopyrite, with gold and silver likely contained within the pyrite, with the pyrrhotite likely an associated but not host sulphide. The veins typically show a sericite (-chlorite) alteration halo, however this appears to be more associated with the quartz veining itself rather than sulphides. Observations of the gold-silver-copper-lead-zinc-arsenic mineralisation within sulphidic zones is hosted in composite intrusions of several types of dioritic and granodioritic rock. These intrusives exhibit at least two phases of alteration, which may represent at least two different distinct phases or a spatial association and fractionation between the phases. Alteration within and peripheral to mineralised sulphidic veins occurs as spatially and temporally associated strong to intense phyllic (sericite/muscovite ± pyrite-silica) alteration with predominantly narrow vein selvages. Pockets of weak to strong potassic (biotite-K feldspar) alteration associated with weak copper mineralisation are observed. Figure 4 shows a zone of structurally broken core with high-grade Zn. Initial thoughts on the strong Zn mineralisation within the structural zone point to cross cutting structures. The bulk of the core drilled in the first holes shows relatively intact core (albeit weak near the alteration zones) supporting a competent in-situ Resource. The drilling at New Constitution is predominately orientated east-west to target a north-south interpretation. Although this east-west drilling is not optimal to intercept these interpreted cross-cutting structures, there are other occurrences of elevated Zn in the New Constitution historically drilled datasets to be reviewed and followed up considering potential for cross cutting structures. Typically, where Zn is greater than 1%, gold is over 4 g/t. Of the 5 intercepts where Zn is > 5%, gold ranges from 18g/t to 67 g/t Au (in the database). Figure 4 – TRDD001A core tray sample highlighting intensely faulted/structural zone and high grade Au. Dart Mining NL ABN: 84 119 904 880 Level 6, 412 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Contact: James Chirnside Email: jchirnside@dartmining.com.au Mobile: +61 447 447 613 Webpage: www.dartmining.com.au LinkedIn: Dart Mining NL Twitter: @DartMining 7|Page EXPANSION FOCUS – NORTH AND SOUTH CORRIDOR Existing drill intercept highlights are shown on Figure 5 for the Southern Mineralised Corridor including the Super Hans, Big Hans, New Constitution and South Constitution resource blocks. Existing drill intercept highlights are shown on Figure 6 for the Northern Mineralised Corridor including the Bald Hill resource block and historic Advance mine area. Both areas highlight strong geophysical extensions which are shown in the background of Figure 5 and Figure 6 by the chargeability (ASX: MBK Nov 2016, MBK Jan 2017) as well as historical and current drilling intercepting high grade material. These areas will be a focus for Mineral Resource growth as Dart works through the numerous targets at Triumph with historical and current drilling intercepting high grade material. Figure 5 – Existing drill intercept highlights for the Southern Mineralised Corridor including (east to west) the Super Hans, Big Hans, New Constitution and South Constitution resource blocks with chargeability (geophysics) maps as the background. Figure 6 - Existing drill intercept highlights the Northern Mineralised Corridor including the Bald Hill resource block, Bald Hill East and historic Advance mine area with chargeability (geophysics) maps as the background. 8|Page NEXT STEPS At the Triumph Gold Project, Dart intends to: • Drill test depth potential beneath the Southern Mineralised Corridor and chargeability anomaly to the Northwest of New Constitution. • Continue Diamond drilling to expand the existing resources along strike and at depth; • In the next quarter complete and announce a high-quality Exploration Target for the Triumph Gold Project based upon existing drilling in areas where this drilling does not yet have the required density to proclaim a JORC Resource. • Undertake regional exploration, targeting the project area, as well as testing bulk tonnage targets including those at depth; • Continue to review and identify additional prospective target zones for exploration in addition to existing resource areas; and Continue to review and identify further advanced projects throughout Central Queensland for potential acquisition and joint venture. • Approved for release by the Board of Directors. For more information contact: Please see our Investor Hub for further information James Chirnside Managing Director Dart Mining NL jchirnside@dartmining.com.au +61 419 605 842 Owen Greenberger Head of Exploration / Investor Relations Dart Mining NL ogreenberger@dartmining.com.au About Dart Mining The Triumph Gold Project is Dart’s first step into an advanced intrusion related gold system project in Queensland. Dart will look to develop a regional presence in Queensland through advanced stage intrusion related and epithermal gold projects. Dart Mining will continue to evaluate several historic goldfields in Central and Northeast Victoria including the Rushworth Goldfield and the new porphyry and lithium province in Northeast Victoria identified by Dart. The area is prospective for precious, base, and strategic metals. Dart Mining has built a strategic and highly prospective gold exploration portfolio in Central and Northeast regions of Victoria, where historic surface and alluvial gold mining indicates the existence of potentially large gold endowment. 9|Page Competent Person’s Statement The information in this report has been prepared, compiled, and verified by Mr. Owen Greenberger (B.Sc. Geology), a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr. Greenberger is Head of Exploration for Dart Mining. Mr. Greenberger has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposits under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a competent person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr. Greenberger takes responsibility for the exploration results, and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled and reviewed by Mr Andrew Dawes, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Andrew Dawes is employed by AHD Resources and consults to Dart Mining NL. Mr Andrew Dawes has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources. Mr Andrew Dawes consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Dart Mining confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in this, or referenced relevant market announcements and, in the case of estimates of mineral resources or ore reserves, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates continue to apply and have not materially changed Forward-Looking Statement Certain statements contained in this document constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, Dart Mining’s current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry in which Dart Mining operates, and beliefs and assumptions regarding Dart Mining’s future performance. Such forward-looking statements are based on a number of estimates and assumptions made by the Company and its consultants in light of experience, current conditions and expectations of future developments which the Company believes are appropriate in the current circumstances. When used in this document, words such as; “anticipate”, “could”, “intends”, “estimate”, “potential”, “plan”, “seeks”, “may”, “should”, and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although Dart Mining believes that its expectations presented in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, achievements and performance of the Company to be materially different from the future results and achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking information is no guarantee of future performance and accordingly, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. 10 | P a g e APPENDIX ONE THE TRIUMPH GOLD PROJECT The Triumph Gold Project (Triumph or Project) is located approximately 520km by road north of Brisbane, Queensland, and is well serviced by the coastal port city of Gladstone 80km by road to the north. The Project is comprised of two Exploration Permits: EPM 18486 and EPM 19343 covering an area of 137.6 sq.km or 43 sub-blocks in total. The Company has recently applied for additional area immediately adjacent east of the triumph project with EMP 29097. Figure 6: Location of the Triumph Gold Project Local Geology The Triumph Gold Project is located in the Yarrol belt of the Wandilla Province (New England Orogen), where late Permian to Middle Triassic leucocratic intrusives are scattered throughout Devonian and Carboniferous sediments. Known mineralisation at Triumph is located within one of these intrusive bodies, the Norton Tonalite. The Norton Tonalite is dissected by numerous brittle faults and shears, as well as common minor mafic intrusive dykes of dolerite to basaltic composition. There is a distinct magnetic low signature at the core of the Norton Tonalite which is yet to be drill tested (ASX SHN: (ASX SHN: Robust Maiden Resource at Triumph Gold Project (31 March 2022)). Structure The Norton Tonalite is sinistrally offset by 1.8km by the northwest-trending Norton Fault, which can be traced for over 28km. Initially thought to post date mineralisation, a single drill hole has intersected 11 | P a g e the interpreted Norton Fault which returned 1m @ 2.9g/t Au and 1m @ 2.2g/t Au (ASX MKB: Triumph Gold Project Update Amended (25 July 2014) indicating that the fault may have been active during the main gold mineralisation event. On a local scale the Norton Tonalite has two distinct fracture orientations that both host gold mineralisation. One fracture set is approximately east-west striking and the other is northwestsoutheast striking. These fracture orientations are likely to have formed contemporaneously (ASX SHN: Robust Maiden Resource at Triumph Gold Project (31 March 2022)). Mineralisation Gold and silver mineralisation is hosted in quartz-sulphide veins with pyrite and arsenopyrite forming the bulk of the sulphide. Calcite is abundant in some lodes and present in most or all of them. Veins typically show sericite-chlorite alteration halos although this appears to be more associated with quartz veining rather than sulphides. Mineralisation at Triumph is interpreted as an intrusion related gold system (IRGS) (ASX SHN: Robust Maiden Resource at Triumph Gold Project (31 March 2022)). Morrison (Intrusion-Related Gold Deposits in North Queensland, GSQ Project final meeting 7th December, 2017) stated that there were over 130 known IRGS in Queensland with 17 of these having resources over 1 million ounces. Sunshine have stated that Triumph is analogous to the Ravenswood IRGS gold deposit which has an endowment in excess of 5 million ounces of gold (ASX SHN: Follow Up Drilling at Liontown (19 June 2024)). Resource Highlights The Project is located across the historic Norton Goldfield and has a current JORC (2012) Mineral Resource Estimate prepared over five prospects in close proximity: Inferred gold resource of 150,091 oz made up of 2,16 million tonnes at a grade of 2.17g/t gold using a 1g/t cut-off has been declared in 2025. More than 75% of the Triumph Inferred resource is within 100m of the surface and largely located within 1.2km of strike within a 6km long structural corridor (ASX SHN: Follow Up Drilling at Liontown (19 June 2024)). Dart considers that there is potential for proving up mineralisation below current drilling and open pit depths that may result in underground mining options subject to favourable economic studies. 12 | P a g e APPENDIX TWO JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.) Criteria JORC Code explanation Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to Drilling techniques Drill sample recovery Commentary • • • • Sampling has been made on HQ and NQ diamond drilled core. Sampling is whole core sampling based on the geologists sub sampling (down to 30cm) logging definition. As it is whole core, no sub-sampling techniques were used. Samples are prepared with PREP-31B which includes crush to 70 % passing 2mm, riffle split off 1kg, pulverise split to better than 85% passing 75 microns. • Drilling is diamond drilling either HQ or NQ core size and is triple tube drilling. Core is oriented where possible using the Reflex ACT III tool. • Core is measured after each run and core recovery based on the drill metres is recorded. Once in the transition and fresh material, Triumph experiences limited to no core loss with the exception of intensely broken zones where recovery is still > 95%. • 13 | P a g e Criteria JORC Code explanation preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Logging Subsampling techniques and sample preparation Quality of assay data and laboratory tests • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. Commentary • • • • • • • • • • No relationship has been observed between sample recovery and gold grade. The drill core has been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level to support appropriate mineral resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Core is logged both qualitatively and quantitatively. Core tray photography is both wet and dry photography. All 2,067m have been logged so far. Sampling is discrete based on observed mineralisation, alteration, key structural features. Core is whole core sampling so no sub-sampling techniques in the field are used which ensures appropriate in-situ representation. The PREP-31B method includes crush to 70 % passing 2mm, riffle split off 1kg, pulverise split to better than 85% passing 75 microns. The larger 1kg riffle split is larger than the standard 250g to reduce sample size bias. Sampling size is suitable to represent the mineralisation intersected. All samples were analysed at ALS Global (ALS, Brisbane). All samples were assayed for Au using a 50g fire assay with AU-ICP22 determination as well as ME-MS61 for multi element. In the case where key elements are over range, Ag, Pb, Zn, and Cu was completed using OG-62. As completed with OG46, and Au completed with GRA22. The three types of QAQC samples were used were Certified Reference Material (CRM/Standards), Field Duplicates, and Blank material. The Blanks consist of store-bought sand which has been shown to be barren based on previous work. The Blanks are used to provide information of any possible contamination or calibration issues during the crush, pulverisation, and analytical phases. The field duplicates utilised the spear to collect a second sample to test repeatability (precision) of the original sample. The standards samples are used to 14 | P a g e Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary • • • Verification of sampling and assaying • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. • • • • Location of data points Data spacing and distribution • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. • • • • test the accuracy of the analyses. Three CRMs were OREAS standards and include: OREAS 277, OREAS 245, and OREAS 233. QAQC samples were entered into the sample stream at a rate of 1 in 20. Where lower detection limits were reported for assay results these were replaced by half the lower detection limit for geological interpretation and modelling purposes. All core photos are reviewed by the Competent Person and also visited site during early drilling. No twinned holes have been undertaken. Data from the field log sheets is entered into a digital database, primarily an Excel spreadsheet with subsequent conversion into an SQL database maintained by EarthSQL at the completion of the hole. The Excel spreadsheet has been created with a series of validation criteria in the form of pulldown menus for each data entry that restricts what can be entered into each field and significantly reduces the error associated with data entry. Assay results are received from the laboratory in electronic (via email) format onsite and sent to Sample Data importing to the EarthSQL database. The electronic results are provided in an CSV file. Collars are collected by Dart Geologists using a dGPS Trimble device and is suitable for collecting collar XYZ. All collar coordinates are in MGA94 Z56. Downhole survey has been surveyed using Reflex survey tool. AHD Resources was provided a 3D elevation topography or digital terrain model (“DTM”) for the Triumph area from Dart Mining in the form of a .msh file. The drilling is in fill drilling of the existing Mineral Resource Estimate. As such, the geological continuity is known and expected. Where new lodes are intercepted, multiple drill holes confirm the new lodes along strike. Given the close proximity to the existing MRE, the spacing is sufficient to have confidence in the continuity. 15 | P a g e Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary • • Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. • Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • • No sample compositing has been applied. Drilling is typically orientated perpendicular to the interpreted strike of mineralization where possible. No orientation-based sampling bias has been recognised. However, in some cases the drilling has been sub-parallel to mineralised structures. This has been accounted for in the geological interpretation of the mineral resources a